![]() Finally, equitable partnerships between donors and recipients were integral to reducing inappropriate donations and to improve follow-up and evaluation. User training and access to biomechanical engineers were suggested as necessary for long-term sustainability. Donors were advised to consult national guidelines to ensure equipment was appropriate, desirable and non-costly to both parties. These highlighted the need to consider all stages of the donation process, including planning, sourcing, transporting, training, maintaining and evaluating equipment donation. Results Thirty-three biomedical equipment donation guidelines were identified from governments, WHO, World Bank, academic colleges and non-governmental organisations, and 36 relevant studies in peer-reviewed literature. We conducted a narrative synthesis to identify key factors that were condensed thematically. Methods Retrospective literature review including both academic and grey literature from 1980 to 2018. This pragmatic review summarises existing guidelines and literature relevant to surgical and anaesthesia equipment, with recommendations for future initiatives and research. Challenges such as infrastructure gaps, lack of technological and maintenance capabilities, and non-prioritisation of essential supplies have previously been highlighted. Background Medical equipment donation to low-resource settings is a frequently used strategy to address existing disparities, but there is a paucity of reported experience and evaluation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |